Review: CHILDREN OF RUIN (Children of Time #2), by Adrian Tchaikovsky

I received this book from the publisher, through NetGalley, in exchange for an honest review: my thanks to both of them for this opportunity.

When I approached this novel’s predecessor, Children of Time, I did so with some apprehension, since I’m mildly arachnophobic and the main characters in that story were indeed spiders: imagine my surprise when Adrian Tchaikovsky’s writing not only made my fear a moot point, but compelled me to root unabashedly for the eight-legged heroes of his saga…

The previous novel ended with a hint that there could be further territory to explore in this universe, whose most fascinating element comes from the fact that uplifted creatures are now the more populous, more advanced species, and mankind is still struggling with the aftermath of its civilization’s end. Children of Ruin starts where book 1 ended, with a mixed group of scientist – arachnids and humans – embarked on a voyage of discovery for new frontiers.

Like book 1, this sequel follows two different timelines: the ‘present’ aboard the ship Voyager with its mixed crew, and the more remote past, where a group of terraformers has to deal with the collapse of human civilization and the realization that they might be all that is left of mankind.  With a storyline that somewhat parallels that of the evolution of new intelligence on Kern’s World, home of the spiders, one of the scientists on the ship Aegean uses Dr. Kern’s uplift virus on his octopus specimens to create a viable race for the water world he’s focusing on, thus creating a new intelligent species.

As eager as I was to learn more about the arachnid-human association and their journey of exploration, together with the marvels of the organic ship they traveled on, Children of Ruin did not work for me as well as the first book in the series did, partly because of what I perceived as a form of pattern repetition, and partly because of pacing problems.  Still, I’d like to start with what I enjoyed in this new story.

The alliance between the survivors of mankind and the uplifted spiders is one that works but still needs to bridge many differences, chiefly where inter-species communication is involved: that was one of the most fascinating elements in this novel, with characters endeavoring to find the best approach – either simply linguistic or more mechanical – to understand each other without the mediation of the Kern personality residing in their computer.  And of course there are still the compelling arachnid social dynamics, where the females assert their dominance while the males struggle to obtain recognition in what I perceived as a pointed commentary worked through an interesting role reversal.

The human terraformers offer another thought-provoking perspective, especially in their reactions after the protracted silence from Mother Earth leads them to a dismal conclusion. They all appear as self-centered individuals, more focused on their scientific goals than on building a cohesive group so far away from home – in other worlds, an echo of Avrana Kern, multiplied by five, which made me think often about the author’s overall negative vision about humanity.

Then there are the octopuses, whose journey toward increased intellect somewhat parallels that of the spiders, but of course with substantial differences due both to their nature and to the liquid environment they live in, which offers fascinating angles in the creation of their society and its evolution, both planet-side and in space. For example, there are two curious details that stuck to my mind: one is that being boneless octopuses don’t suffer from the bone deficiencies that plague spaces after a prolonged permanence in microgravity; and two, for creatures that can move in several directions, there is no concept of ‘up’ or ‘down’ to upset directional perceptions as it happens to humans.

All of the above elements intrigued me of course, together with the addition of a new kind of creature bent on assimilating other forms of life to understand them, which added further pressure on the already tense situation between octopuses and the explorers from Kern’s World. Still, the octopuses’ evolution did not feel as compelling as that of the spiders in the first novel, and there was a great deal of space dedicated to their biological and psychological progress that felt more like a textbook than a work of fiction, lacking the irresistible quality of the evolutionary saga of the arachnids. Where I cared – so surprisingly, given my bias – for the way the spiders evolved in the course of the millennia of their history, I could not feel equally engaged with the octopuses’ journey, and what’s worse I could not feel any connection with the spiders featured in this novel: this perceived remoteness on my part was the main reason I was not invested in this story as I was with the first book.

Much of my reaction could be ascribed to the lack of novelty compared with its predecessor, since I could not erase the feeling of “been there, done that” that plagued me for most of the way, and moreover the overall plot gave off the feeling of being artificially intricate, lacking the beautiful, clear progression I enjoyed with Children of Time, which does not mean I did not enjoy this story but that I feel how a more… streamlined narrative would have worked better for my tastes.

I’m glad I read this, but nonetheless I can’t avoid the consideration that sequels often thread on dangerous ground, and this one might not have always successfully avoided the pitfall of such ground.


My Rating:

20 thoughts on “Review: CHILDREN OF RUIN (Children of Time #2), by Adrian Tchaikovsky

  1. More textbook than fiction was kind of how I felt about book 1 and I struggled with it quite a bit, so I guess I probably should avoid this one? I think octupuses are fascinating and I’d love to see more SFF books feature them, but this kind of does sound like a rinse and repeat.

    “I could not feel equally engaged with the octopuses’ journey, and what’s worse I could not feel any connection with the spiders.” Out of context, this line sounds really strange and funny and I love it. 😀

    Liked by 2 people

    1. LOL It’s true that writing about the missed connection with the (eeeeekkk!!!) spiders sounds strange, indeed… 🙂
      While I was fascinated by the spiders’ evolution in the first book, here that… magic, for want of a better word, was next to non-existent and that’s the main reason for my feelings of disappointment.


  2. I liked this a tad more than you, but I also agree there was a sense of been there done that, and the wearing off of the novelty definitely contributed to this one falling short of its predecessor. The edge still goes to book one!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Sequels always tread on very slippery ground, and this one’s footing, just to stay on the metaphor, seemed uncertain of its footing, hence my lack of total involvement in the narrative. Still, it was an interesting read, although I’m not certain if I would go for a third book in the same universe…


  3. Children of Time I have on my shelf, and need to finally read. Pity this one is not as good, but with my enthusiasm for Tchaikovsky, I will get there one day. At least it’s not as disappointing as McClellan’s foray into Urban Fantasy 😉

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I consider Children of Time a “must” read for any SF enthusiast, because it’s a new take on the genre, especially when you take into account the nature of the… main characters 🙂
      From what I gathered, reading various reviews, Tchaikovsky has something of a checkered record, so I guess it’s a matter of luck with any of his books one choses to read…

      Liked by 1 person

    1. I feel I can more than safely recommend Children of Time – you can’t go wrong with that one (provided that spiders don’t make you run away screaming, of course…), and if you already like the author you will not be disappointed with that one 🙂


  4. This is an excellent review and though I am a solid fan of his writing – I love his sheer ambition and willingness to continually have a go at pushing the envelope – I did feel in places that he tried to do too much with the storyline over too vast a span of time and consequently the characterisation suffered. I gave this one 7/10 which is the lowest score I’ve ever given his writing. That said, his name on a cover guarantees that I will get hold of the book:))

    Liked by 2 people

    1. From the reviews I’ve read so far, Tchaikovsky’s writing – and reader commitment – vary greatly from one book to the next, so I guess this was one of the less engaging stories and I must persevere 🙂 in my search for his better works…

      Liked by 1 person

      1. He is very adventurous, writing a wide variety of books in different settings – the only books I couldn’t get on with is his epic insect series Shadows of the Apt, but lots of people absolutely love them. His Shadow of the Fall epic about animals with souls is a wonderful read, in my opinion. I’ve also particularly enjoyed his novellas Dogs of War and The Expert System’s Brother and Spiderlight. I also loved Redemption’s Blade, but it has received mixed reviews.

        Liked by 1 person

        1. I did try Shadows of the Apt but could not get into it – to be truthful it was a peculiar moment for me and my mood at the time might have influenced my opinion, so the jury is still out on it, while I think about giving it another chance. The Shadows of the Fall core concept sounds downright fascinating, so I’m adding it to my “wanted” list: thank you for the tip! 🙂

          Liked by 1 person

          1. Oh I agree about the concept, but I found the pacing too slow and there weren’t enough characters that I was really rooting for. But then, I can’t get on with George R.R. Martin’s Song of Ice and Fire for the same reason, either. I far preferred the TV series!

            Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.