TV Review: STAR TREK DISCOVERY – first (spoiler free) impressions


There is no doubt that Star Trek: Discovery was one of the most anticipated TV series for this year, with curiosity reaching higher levels at each delay in the release date, and expectations running the whole spectrum from eagerness to dread, the latter more easily found in the group of old-time fans who were sorely disappointed by latest productions like Enterprise on the small screen or the J.J. Abrams movies on the big one.

I believe these are mostly people whose first significant contact with televised science fiction started with Star Trek (either the original series or one of the later ones) and who found themselves profoundly inspired by the ideal of a galaxy-spanning Federation whose main goals were the exploration of the unknown and the creation of peaceful relations with other species, so that Star Trek incarnated their benchmark for the future of humanity.  This utopian standard was maintained all throughout the various incarnations of the show (with one exception – I’ll come back to this in a while) upon the mandate of creator Gene Roddenberry, who stipulated early on that the spacefaring crews, and the societies they originated from, had found a way to settle their conflicts and to live in harmony.

While this directive gave Star Trek its distinctive outlook, one that offered a hope for the future – particularly when the show aired in troubled times – it also represented, in my opinion, a set of shackles that on occasion hampered the writers’ creative range and probably robbed the stories of that pinch of “courage and daring” that would have elevated many of them from the simply good to the outstanding.  One of the many examples of this phenomenon could be observed with Voyager: the mixed crew of Federation officers and Maquis rebels offered a huge potential for cultural and ideological clash, and therefore interesting stories and character studies, but this potential was soon disposed of by having the two halves of the crew merge and combine seamlessly just a few episodes into the first season.

By that same rule, the Federation and its representatives had to be irreproachable, perfect in their selfless pursuit of the common good, so that when Deep Space 9 “dared” to show the flaws in this impossibly perfect exterior (high-ranking officers giving in to their dark side; the shady Section 31, and so on) many fans protested at this dismal turn of the story – a turn that generated, when allowed to run its course, some of the most interesting and compelling narrative threads.  Because, let’s face it, conflict – be it a strife between contrasting personalities or an outright fight between opposing factions – is what can fuel a multi-faceted story whose outcome needs to be unpredictable to hold our continuing interest.

Back to Star Trek: Discovery, it’s my belief – after seeing the first four episodes – that the main point of contention from the viewers who did not like what they saw is exactly this: they might feel “betrayed” by the fact that the Federation finds itself engaged in a war.  I will not linger on other complaints that I consider purely… cosmetic: yes, the Klingons’ appearance has been changed, again, and while I see no reason for that change (I liked their look from TNG onwards, thank you very much), I can take that in stride; yes, the time-frame for the show is set several years before that of the original series, and yet there is ample evidence of more advanced technology, but I believe that trying to compare what we can do with CGI today with what was available 50 years ago (not to mention the improvements in our present technology) is something of a futile exercise: maintaining the continuity with a show that aired so long ago, with so little means at its disposal, would prove counterproductive, in the end.  What I would like to really focus on is the story, and the characters: from my point of view, they are all that truly matters.

The biggest complaint I’ve read about the new series, and its characters in particular, is that they “have no soul”: in my opinion it might be a premature judgment, because we hardly had time to get to know these people, and many of us might be falling prey to the modern bad habit of wanting to be instantly wooed from the very start.  Remember the times when a tv show took at least one season, if not more, to find its footing? TNG took three to really get into gear, mostly thanks to the Borg, and DS9’s true potential started to come out in season 4, when the Dominion raised its ugly head.  Yet viewers, despite some unavoidable complaints, stayed for the duration and in the end came to enjoy and love those shows.   So why are so many of us not ready to give this show a chance?  It might fizzle out into boredom or predictability, I’ll grant you that, but for now we should give it the benefit of the doubt, and time to get used to its… new shoes.

Personally, I’m quite happy to see a good number of strong female figures that are not relegated in the role of caregivers – doctors, counselors, teachers for the kids living on board: the story opens with two women, a captain and her first officer, engaged in a mission on an inhospitable planet.  I liked immediately Captain Georgiou, the mix of experience, wisdom and humor that came to the fore from the very start: she gave the impression of a person who’s quite comfortable in her role and in her own skin, and if a certain scene with the Federation symbol drawn in the sand felt a little over the top, the overall effect was more than positive.  I’m still trying to get a grip on Commander Michael Burnham instead (including the reason she goes by a male name…), but she looks promising: having been raised on Vulcan she is an interesting mix between human passion and Vulcan logic and that could be the main reason she looks so hard to pin down. And again, on board Discovery we meet a woman at the head of the security section: her appearance has been brief, so far, but her air of strong, no-nonsense competence made an impact on me and I hope she will not remain an exception.

As for the story, or what little I saw until this point, it looks darker, far more serious than the usual Star Trek offerings, and that’s mirrored by the dimmer ambient lighting, quite a departure from the bright lights and colors of the various Enterprises or of Voyager.  The Federation finds itself at war with the Klingons, and if some might feel inclined to disagree with this narrative choice, I’d like to remind them that in the times of the original series, relations with the Klingons were quite strained and always on the verge of an all-out conflict: if this turns out to be the story of how that uneasy truce came to be, I will be very interested in following its progress.  This war, one that was not actively sought but still needs to be fought, might very well represent the catalyst (or one of them anyway) for the process that led the Federation to the reasoned adherence to its founding principles as we came to know and appreciate them.  And it might also be the background for the thought-provoking character and narrative arcs I’m looking for: there is a scene in which a crewman asks how it could have happened, how could the Federation find itself waging war when their goals are exploration and learning, and in this dichotomy – a hard, painful dichotomy that hopefully will engage many characters’ moral compass – we might find a multi-layered story worth watching.

All we need to do is indeed give Discovery some time to grow, and to grant ourselves a little patience and faith…

18 thoughts on “TV Review: STAR TREK DISCOVERY – first (spoiler free) impressions

  1. I think it’s superficial, but I guess that’s okay for entertainment. Nice visuals, but what really bothered me was that much of the dialogue make me cringe. I dropped out after episode 3.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I was so excited for this new series, but I have to say I was not overly impressed with the first couple of episodes. Like you said though, it’ll probably take show some time to grow and I know early episodes can be difficult. I have not seen episode three yet, but I hear there is a marked improvement to the story, and the opinion is that ep. 1-2 merely served as a “prequel” (and I’ll try not to let that annoy me too much!) 😛

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I started watching while well aware that in all probability Trek has already said all it had to say (50 years is indeed a long time), so I was not expecting a world-changing experience and that’s the main reason I can look at it with some equanimity. I look forward to your comments once you’ve seen some more… 🙂


  3. No surprise, I agree with your thoughts here. I like a complex set of characters with competing ideas; even in a well oiled machine, people will have their opinions. Because I like the actress playing Burnam (Sasha!), I was drawn to her. Definitely loved the female characters’ presence in all the episodes so far, and I think the effects are overall quite good. My favorite character, so far, is Saru.

    My husband is utterly hooked on this show.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I haven’t seen it yet, but I am curious. And I enjoyed your very thorough review, by the way! I’m still a big fan of TNG, but I do like the idea of a darker story.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. TNG is (sadly) starting to show its years (with a few wonderful exceptions like “The Inner Light” or “Measure of a Man”, just to quote a couple), while this new series might be able to go even where DS9 was not allowed to – fingers crossed 🙂


  5. I have not see this yet so I curious to see what you thought. I’m a big fan of the original series and what I liked most about it was the array of new worlds and situations they discovered- the sens e that the cosmos is so vast and their mission is 5 YEARS. Yeah it looks silly now but I thought some of those stories had heart. So exploring that angle has always been what I wanted from a new Trek series, and each new series has had its own strengths and weaknesses.

    I’ve heard some good early buzz for this one and I hope it’s successful, I really should give it a try. And I agree- we need to give it time to find it’s niche.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Granted, the sense of wonder of that first series has been somewhat lost – we are now quite familiar (sort of) with the surprises and dangers of the galaxy after 50 years of stories, but the human soul is still an unexplored territory and if this new series will head that way, given the dark and controversial premise, we might be pleasantly surprised.
      And yes, I always tend to be optimistic… 🙂


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.