Review: LOST BOY: The True Story of Captain Hook, by Christina Henry

Once we grow up we are able to acknowledge the basic cruelty that lies at the root of many (if not all) fairy tales: think about Cinderella’s stepsisters chopping off their toes to make the crystal shoe fit; or Snow White’s stepmother asking the hunter to bring her the girl’s heart – the examples are endless.  I believe that such brutal details might serve as a subliminal reminder that the world is not fair and that children should not trust blindly.  Still, there are some tales that seem to point only to lightness and fun, especially in the more widely known, and edulcorated, Disney movie version, as is the case of the story of Peter Pan: I remember watching some scenes with my nephew when he was little, and even potentially frightening situations – like being chased by a crocodile – were turned into amusing and non-threatening vignettes.

Now imagine my dismay once I encountered Ms. Henry’s version of Peter Pan, a character I’ve always been lukewarm about but never actually disliked, even though his name is connected to the syndrome shown by men who refuse to grow up and take responsibility for their lives, so that it shines a less-than-bright light on the character.  Lost Boy, on the other hand, gives us an interpretation of Peter that is as chilling as it is engrossing, and I was surprised at the intensity of the hatred I felt for him reading this novel. This is indeed the kind of story that can’t leave you unmoved…

The story is told from the point of view of Jamie, Peter’s very first companion on the island and for quite some time the only one: he, like the other boys who will later follow, was lured to Neverland with the promise of a life of endless fun and games, free from hunger or pain. In theory, the boys Peter brings over are escaping from an existence of Dickensian drudgery, but in reality it’s not always so: there is a recurring fragment of memory that haunts Jamie and that will later on showcase Peter’s duplicity with dramatic starkness.  The real reason the boys are brought to the island is the fulfillment of Peter’s narcissistic tendencies, his need to always be at the center of attention, admired, adored, idolized: it would not really be such a terrible life if he didn’t drive his companions to reckless escapades and bloody battles with the neighboring pirates…

It’s trough Jamie’s eyes that we see behind the façade of never-ending play and fun: the island is a dangerous place, inhabited by ravenous crocodiles that have nothing in common with their playful counterparts in Disney’s movie, then there are the Many-Eyed, a kind of huge arachnids whose blood is poisonous and burns like acid; or the pirates might resent the boys’ more daring escapades and retaliate with violence.  As if that were not enough, there are always injuries and illness to contend with, or the violent Battles pitching boys against each other as Peter enjoys the spectacle like a Roman emperor of old, and which has caused the death of many young people over the years: it has fallen to Jamie to bury them, as it falls to him to care for the newcomers and to see that everyone is clothed, fed, and in good health.  Yes, because Peter is extremely careless of his playmates, just like a child who unthinkingly tosses aside a toy that does not interest him any more, or is broken: as long as they provide the willing and cheering audience he craves, he’s the genial host, the enthusiastic companion, the charismatic leader; but as soon as someone stops being entertaining, Peter is quick to adopt the “out of sight, out of mind” policy, when not leaving the various island’s dangers work for him in removing the nuisance from the equation.

As the story opens, Peter has quickly tired of his new acquisition, five-year old Charlie, a child far too young to be taken away from the Other Place or to participate in the boys’ increasingly dangerous escapades, and therefore boring and useless according to Peter’s rules.  Jamie has become his guardian and protector and Charlie has developed a sort of hero worship for him that does not agree with Peter’s worldview, and what’s worse, the time and energies Jamie devotes to the newest arrival are time and energies he does not give Peter – a truly unforgivable sin.  The picture that emerges from Jamie’s point of view is indeed disturbing, with Peter appearing at best as a self-centered narcissist and at worst as a dangerous sociopath, a jealous self-declared god: as the story progresses the information we gather becomes more and more unnerving, destroying every notion we might have held until that moment about Neverland and Peter’s entourage.

On the other hand, Jamie comes across as a very sympathetic character and one that’s quite easy to love: in a group of people who have run away from dire situations and unloving families, Jamie takes on the role of a parent and, in some measure, of a leader who possesses all the qualities that Peter lacks. What’s fascinating is that as Jamie’s disaffection mounts, estranging him from his former friend, still he harbors a measure of guilt about those feelings, as if his growing consciousness of Peter’s shortcomings were a betrayal – that is, until he realizes that his loyalty was one-sided and the other boy did nothing but take and take, without giving anything back.  What happens at that point is extraordinary, because Jamie realizes his body is growing, that he’s leaving the eternal childhood in which he was frozen by the island’s magic: each growing spurt is accompanied by pain – and that’s another fascinating metaphor, indeed – brought on by the increasing awareness of Peter’s dual cruelty and carelessness, not unlike those of an escalating serial killer.

This loss of innocence, of that childish vision that prevents us from seeing the nastier side of life, is the most poignant element in Lost Boy, and even the realization that Jamie is fated to become Peter’s arch-enemy, Captain Hook, isn’t as heartbreaking as the chain of losses he must endure.  To say that he left a deep mark on my imagination would be a huge understatement indeed.


My Rating: 

21 thoughts on “Review: LOST BOY: The True Story of Captain Hook, by Christina Henry

  1. I’ve been meaning to read this one but held off because I’d heard how unlikeable Peter was. The contrast between Jamie and Peter sounds fascinating, though, so maybe I’ll bump it up the TBR.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Well, I was never a fan of Disney’s Peter Pan – but I am still a fan of Barrie’s Peter Pan :). I am not fond of the recent revisionist wave of books blatantly using his creation after the copyright expired. I think Barrie himself left enough doubt about Peter Pan’s moral values – he describes him as amoral and heartless, like all children – that I don’t need anyone else to do my thinking for me or make an outright villain of Peter. Still, a great review!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Probably the author wanted to show there are always two sides (if not more) to a person or a personality and that much depends on the point of view and the eye of the beholder: not being familiar with Barrie’s original, I can’t vouch for the disparity in the treatment of Peter, but still I can say that this is a story that leaves its mark… 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

      1. It may very well be an intriguing, well written story – I guess I oppose the principle on which novels like this are written, not the stories themselves 🙂 But your review did encourage me to take a look at this book! 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

        1. I stand firm by the “law” that says that a book must *speak* to you as soon as your eyes fall down on it, that it must… sing an irresistible song, like a siren. When there are doubts, well, we must trust our instincts 🙂


  3. I had a wonderful time with this book too, but yes, it was quite heartbreaking wasn’t it? Also, I’ve never really liked the character of Peter Pan, even the Disney version made him seem snotty and annoying. But Henry’s Peter is downright psychotic! I thought that was kind of neat actually, if nothing else because it made the reader sympathize with Jamie. So many authors have attempted to write a retelling from Hook’s POV, but I think Henry’s the only one who has managed to make me really care.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. This is my first re-telling of a well-known tale, and I must say that, though it was emotionally wrecking, I did enjoy the way it moved and intrigued me, the way it made me passionate about what was happening in the story. If other re-tellings are on this same level of reader commitment, I might have found a new sub-genre I love! 🙂


  4. Wow – this sounds like an intense read! I’d be concerned that my hatred for Peter would outweigh all else… but those occasions where you get a character you love to hate are often worth the risk! Great review and I’ll add it to my list! 😀

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I’m a bit awkward about retellings and sequels to classics – it’s such an awkward tightrope to walk – but it sounds like this is an excellent one. …I’m not sure I’ll rush to pick it up though, it also sounds like hard emotional labour, and I’m not looking for any fresh challenges on that front for a while 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I guess that being forewarned about the emotional depths tapped by the story, you might want to wait for the right frame of mind, and you would not be wrong, because I can tell you that at times it was painful – in the good way of skilled authors, but still painful…

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Like you, I never read the original book and I have only a passing familiarity with the Disney movie, so I can tell you that this book can be enjoyed on its own. Even being unaware of the Peter Pan myth, one can appreciate this deeply emotional story and the well-drawn characters. I hope you enjoy it once you get to it 🙂


  6. Wow, this sounds like quite a tale. Your description of Peter Pan made me think of our President…Peter Pan really is a narcissist, even in the Disney version

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Your comparison was surprising at first, but thinking about it I saw where the points of contact are, especially in the total inability to listen to others and in the burning need to be right, no matter what…


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.